HAND
TO HAND TRAINING
FOR
THE ARMED FORCES & THE SPECIAL OPERATION PERSONNEL
Dr.
Deepak Rao MD,MB,PhD, FRSH
Advanced
Commando Combat System(ACCS)
3rd
degree Black Belt Instructor AMO,
specialop@hotmail.com
b)
UACM
assumes that the predetermined response can be learned and
effected by the soldier, reflexly.
c)
UACM
does not teach you range fighting, at different distances i.e.
Kicking at long range,boxing at intermediate & wrestling and judo at close
ranges.
d)
UACM
is not flexible and adaptive, and assumes clockwork like movements
from both the attacker and the defending soldier.
e)
UACM
does not include modern techniques from the present day Martial
arts like Taekwondo, Thai, Kick boxing, Filipino Kali, Wrestling, Judo, Aikido,
Boxing etc.
The
useful techniques from the present day modern Martial art, have to be modified
to suit the present day requirements in commando close quarter warfare.
In
the same situation a heavier and shorter man may use a different technique,
and a taller and lighter man will use a different one.
A)
either
newer adaptations of the same old
UAC, or
B)
are
newer versions of compartmentalized arts like Taekwondo, Judo etc
C)
mixtures
of two or three martial arts.
An art devised for the Fighting forces has to be free of
fixed technique, and user friendly, and should be very well researched for
many years, among large numbers for usefulness.
Hand
to hand Combat with or without weapons is very important in building tremendous aggression,
self confidence and survival instincts in soldiers. Tremendous research by
our academy has evolved a unique combat art tailor-made for Police and Defence
Forces
ACCS
refers to the Hand to Hand Combat Art we have specially developed for Commando
Close Quarter Battle situations( developed by Dr Deepak Rao).
This
art is the result of extensive
research and retrospectiion after training more than 10,000 uniformed personnel
for over 10 years.
1)
Conventional
Martial Arts like Karate, Taekwondo, Judo, Boxing and Wrestling are
point-oriented sports, taught separately in a compartmentalized manner confuse
the trainee about which technique can be used in an actual combat situation. There
is a need to create insecurity, threat and aggression, to bring out the survival
instincts in the trainees.
2)
In ACCS, combat is taught by clashing men
together with taller, heavier, more aggressive opponents (at different
ranges)
3)
By
ACCS special drills, situations are
created where one does not find time to think/use fixed technique but allows his
animal survival instinct to find appropriate technique for the relevant
situation thereby letting the mind go free, its own way.
4)
The
only goal is effectivity, to terminate / handicap /cripple the opponent with the
slightest effort.
5)
ACCS
imbibes useful principles and foul tactics from all martial arts. It rejects the
limitations and complicated techniques which need years of skill training.
The conclusion is simple, armed forces instructors must study the operational requirements of their force and accordingly devise newer drills to meet the situations. Rules must be broken and effectivity must be advocated. The art must constantly evolve. This is true freedom in the martial arts.